Vasectomy Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Vasectomy, including details on procedure, risks, statistics, contraception, reversal. | ||||||||
|
Factors affecting successful outcome from ICSI in men following previous vasectomy.Bromage SJ, Douglas J, Falconer DA, Lieberman BA, Payne SR Department of Urology, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK. sjbromage@doctors.org.uk There are conflicting reports as to whether the interval between vasectomy and surgical sperm retrieval (SSR) for intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is related to clinical pregnancy (CPR), and live birth (LBR), rates. This study aimed to evaluate factors that may influence the outcome of ICSI in males with secondary azoospermia due to previous vasectomy. We analysed the medical records of 198 azoospermic males following vasectomy who underwent percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA) and/or testicular sperm extraction (TeSE), between 1997 and 2005 by a single urologist, and whose sperm was subsequently frozen for use in an IVF treatment programme on their partner's behalf. Hundred and forty-four (73%) males had a positive PESA, and the remaining 54 (27%) had a positive TeSE. Forty-four percent of males with no clinical evidence of epididymal distension still had epididymal sperm retrieved successfully. Hundred and twenty-eight patients proceeded with ICSI, and a total of 237 cycles were performed. The CPR and LBR overall were 29 and 27%, respectively. Using logistic regression there was no association between time since vasectomy and CPR (P = 0.17) or LBR (P = 0.31). A history of an attempted reversal of vasectomy did not negatively affect retrieval rates or CPR and LBR. The success of SSR and the outcome of ICSI, using frozen sperm, are independent of male age and time since vasectomy. Epididymal sperm may be retrieved in over 40% of men in whom there is no clinical evidence of epididymal distension. Published 19 September 2007 in World J Urol, 25(5): 519-24.
© 2004-2008 Vasectomy Research Today. All Rights Reserved. |
| ||||||
